• Food

    Posted on January 22nd, 2012

    Written by

    Cooking up a Storm

    I made my first ever quiche this morning – well, crustless spinach bacon & cheese mini-quiches – and it turned out so nicely that I want to share. I modified it from a bunch of recipes so I’ll just put what I did.

    Ingredients:

    • Onion
    • Fresh Spinach
    • Shredded Cheese
    • Oil to cook
    • 6 eggs
    • Cream or milk (optional)
    • 4-5 strips cooked bacon (optional)
    • Salt & pepper to taste

    Finely dice half of a medium-sized onion. Cook for several minutes, until translucent, in some oil in a deep pan, like a chicken fryer. You want room for the spinach. While the onions cook, chop about half a bag of fresh spinach. When the onions are mostly done, stir in the spinach and cook until wilted, a few minutes.

    In the meantime, beat six eggs. Add about a quarter cup of milk or cream, if you so desire; otherwise add a little water. Stir in shredded cheese of your choice. Now, the recipe I saw called for five eggs and three cups – THREE CUPS! – of cheese. I used about a cup of cheese and added the extra egg instead. Add salt and pepper. Stir the onion/spinach mixture in a little at a time so you don’t accidentally cook the eggs.

    I also cooked about half a package of bacon ahead of time, so I crumbled in four or five strips of completely cooled bacon. (I use a jelly roll pan lined with heavy aluminum foil, lay out the bacon, put into a cold oven, turn on to 400 degrees and walk away for twenty minutes. Voila – bacon!) You could use finely diced ham, tomatoes, broccoli, anything you want. I want bacon.

    Pour into twelve greased muffin cups and bake at 350 for 15-18 minutes. I think next time I might adjust down to 325 because a few were a little overdone. The eggs should be just set. I used a mini silicone spatula to remove the quiche from the cups and transfer to a cooling rack. Now I’m going to bag them, two by two into sandwich bags, and take one to work with me each day to toss into the microwave for breakfast, maybe with a spoonful of salsa on top.

    If you aren’t eating them right away and plan to reheat, make sure the eggs are JUST set so that when you heat them, they won’t be overdone.

  • Life

    Posted on January 8th, 2012

    Written by

    Advice

    I like to read advice columns because they make me feel like I can deal with anything that comes up, since I’ve already seen just about everything. My favorites are Savage Love, Carolyn Hax, Dear Prudence, and Dear Wendy. (I used to love Mr. Blue on Salon.)

    I also like how they make me feel so smugly sane, normal, and well-adjusted.

  • Current Affairs

    Posted on December 25th, 2011

    Written by

    And to all, a good night

    Merry Christmas to all!

  • Culture

    Posted on December 10th, 2011

    Written by

    Are Gamers War Criminals?

    The Red Cross thinks so.

    Key quote, as with every instance of nanny do-gooding: “[T]here is clearly no simple answer. There is, however, an overall consensus and motivation to take action.”

    Ah! The do-something impulse, which causes so many many terrible, bad laws and ever-expands the powers of the state to regulate every aspect of our lives. Now even gamers aren’t safe.

  • Food

    Posted on November 24th, 2011

    Written by

    Pie Tricks

    Just wanted to share a tip for you last-minute pie makers. Last night, I blind baked my crust and it turned out beautifully – my pumpkin pie crust is crispy and delicious this morning! Blind baking just means pre-baking; you don’t need to do it for fruit pies, but for something like a quiche or a pumpkin pie it works great. Here’s how:

    1. Roll out your crust and put it in the pan like normal.
    2. Put in your pie weights.
    3. I’m just kidding! I know you don’t have pie weights. Instead, line the crust with tinfoil so the whole thing is covered. Fill with a bag of dried beans – any kind will do, I used a cheap bag of frijoles negro.
    4. Bake at 350 for 15-20 minutes. Remove the beans and the tinfoil – careful, they are hot! Save the beans in a jar labeled “pie weights” so you know not to cook them.
    5. Bake another 15 minutes unshielded.
    6. Before pouring the filling in, heat it up a little (or at least let it become room temperature – that’s what I did because I didn’t want to have to temper anything).
    7. Apply your crust shield and bake as usual.

    Another reason your crust may get soggy is you might be over-baking your pumpkin pie. When it gets too hot, the proteins in the eggs and milk will become denatured, which means they leak water – and the water soaks the crust. Boo. Try this instead – when your pie timer goes off, check for doneness about 2/3 of the way to the center. If it’s done there but still gooey in the center, take it out anyway! The custard continues to cook after you remove it from the oven. Walk away and when you come back in fifteen or twenty minutes, you’ll find that the center finished baking and the whole pie has set. Delicious, delicious pumpkin crispy goodness!

    Oh, and Happy Thanksgiving!

  • Blogging

    Posted on November 17th, 2011

    Written by

    Hooray!

    Mostly back in order around here, yay! The only thing not working is my pictures didn’t import; and I need to find my banner image with the blog’s name and reconstruct my blogroll. But everything else looks normal.

    All I can say is, I [heart] you, Paul S! Thanks for the help!

  • Siri Will Save Us All

    Inspired by this Slate article discussing the use of Siri to text while driving, I decided to explore the local statute banning texting and driving in the State of Missouri – but only for those under 21. The Missouri law prohibits “operating a moving motor vehicle upon the highways of this state…”while you “by means of a hand-held electronic wireless communications device, send, read, or write a text message or electronic message.”

    I am, as a libertarian, not a big fan of knee-jerk prohibitions in response to a crazed national trend. I put the texting-and-driving bans in that category because texting is no more dangerous (or, likely, prevalent) than eating and driving, not sleeping enough and driving, playing with your radio or messing with your dog/baby while driving, etc. Some studies show that just talking on the phone – including on a handheld set – is just as distracting, but lawmakers know people would be outraged if they tried to ban that so they go after the easy win.

    That said, I have to give props to the Missouri legislature (or, more likely, their young and tech-savvy staff members) for having the foresight to see Siri coming:

    10. The provisions of this section shall not apply to…

    (4) The use of voice-operated technology.

    Way to go, MO!

    Unfortunately, by criminalizing texting and driving for ANYONE, evidence of texting at the time of an accident will still be used in civil cases and probably criminal cases as well. People will have to argue about (A) whether they have Siri or a similar service (B) that they were using at the time of the incident and (C) whether that’s a distraction that caused an accident. Eventually the technology will spread to the point that the presumption by “reasonable jurors” will be that if you don’t have and use voice technology, you’re not exercising the highest standard of care (and therefore open to liability). Never mind that smartphones are the expensive mobile communication devices that not everyone can afford; and that different types of voice technologies will have different eases of use.

    Now if only we could get a “safe-driving” discount for upgrading to iPhone 4S…

    One more thing to add: This is a good example of the conflict (and lag) between law and technology; and that lawmakers (unlike those in Missouri) won’t always see the next logical step in the evolution of any given tech. People in other states with Siri are going to be open to criminal sanctions and civil liability until the law can be adjusted again to accommodate voice recognition. In this era of partisan stonewalling, some may never get there. I hate simple matters of common sense being subject to such a lengthy – and subjective – process.

  • Current Affairs

    Posted on October 16th, 2011

    Written by

    Saving the Environment through…the flat tax?

    Apparently Herman Cain is advocating for a sales tax that would replace income tax. The benefit of the sales tax is that you control how much you pay by controlling how much you spend. Perhaps that encourages more people to save more money, or purchase more services rather than goods, which could be good for the new (non-manufacturing-based) economy.

    But I found one detail particularly interesting: No sales tax on used goods. Isn’t that an amazing way to help the environment? If you’re not purchasing cheap plastic junk from China (or even expensive plastic junk) then you’re recycling. Instead of buying a new iPhone, buy a used iPhone 4 and you won’t pay sales tax…plus you won’t be junking up a landfill with your old phone, because chances are someone will want to buy it to avoid paying sales tax. I’d also waive sales tax on fresh fruits, vegetables, and eggs, because we want to encourage people to eat that instead of things that are full of refined flour and corn syrup.

    I wonder why environmentalists haven’t called for this kind of taxing scheme in the past?

  • Blogging

    Posted on September 21st, 2011

    Written by

    Sorry about that

    My site has been down for half of forever. GoDaddy, my hosting service, thought it had spotted the problem and I had to patch, and patch, and patch, and patch again, my WordPress software. Turns out that wasn’t it at all, it was a simple re-publish fix. Whoops! But now I’m back.

  • Blogging, Culture

    Posted on August 8th, 2011

    Written by

    Social Media Blurs the Lines

    I’ve been having a problem with Twitter, and as we move closer and closer to the next Presidential election, I think it’s only going to get worse.

    Back in the early days of the blogosphere, online relationships were easy: I would have advised any new blogger to develop a thick skin, because if they got big enough to have readers they didn’t personally know, then they would attract not just readers who disagreed with them, but who did so rudely. That’s okay, in my opinion. Part of the joy and the beauty of the internet is that people can feel free to express their true selves with little to no accountability. What the internet age has revealed is simply what many have suspected for years: The majority of people, deep down in their innermost being, are raging assholes.

    Again, I say: That’s okay. We humans have developed filters and other coping mechanisms and strategies for dealing with the general level of assholery present in daily life. We tend to associate only with those who fall into our general vicinity on the asshole scale. For example, I tend to value friendships with people who aren’t bigots,* racists,* homophobes,* or stupid. (Somewhat redundant, I know, but I’m getting to a point here.) I value people who are kind and generous, even if they aren’t the most articulate or “book-smart” people in the world. I value people who are wicked intelligent, so long as they are open-minded about sometimes being wrong. I value people who have a quick wit, a glib tongue, a biting sense of humor, so long as they wield it responsibly. I value people whose opinions on issues, even those I hold most dear to my heart, differ from my own, so long as they understand and believe that people can disagree with them without being stupid, ignorant, racist, bigoted, uninformed, homophobic, knuckle-dragging, mouth-breathing trogolodytes of suspect origins.

    Which brings me to Twitter. Recall that I started out talking about the Olden Days of the internet – days when my “imaginary friends” who read & interacted on my blog were mostly people I didn’t know IRL and would almost certainly never meet. I said I was fine with people being shockingly rude in those interactions because it’s a feature of the online anonymity.

    But what to do about Twitter? The fact is, almost everyone I follow is in St. Louis. The vast majority of them are people who I have actually met in person, or who are friends once removed – friends of a friend of mine. I follow a small number of people because I make a habit of actually reading, digesting, and remembering what they’re saying on Twitter – otherwise, why follow them? I interact with these people regularly, online and at social functions like Yelp Supper Club or social media events.

    Normal social etiquette, I think, dictates certain behavioral norms when interacting face-to-face with people who are friends with your friends, and who are in your circle of acquaintances such that you expect to run into them over and over again as you go about your social life. I personally think those norms carry over into the Twitter realm, because we’re talking about the same people. The fact that I’m speaking to them, and listening to them, from behind a keyboard and computer screen sometimes, and sometimes face-to-face, doesn’t change my real-life connection to them. I would in fact argue that on the scale of acquaintances, the ones with whom I regularly interact on Twitter – who I follow and who follow me – are closer acquaintances than, for instance, the lady in Accounting at work who I speak to maybe once a month at happy hour. Accounting lady doesn’t know any of my other, close friends; she doesn’t know who I’ve been hanging out with or what my interests are, the way that my Tweeps do. But if that gal expressed an opinion with which I disagreed, I would – as per normal social etiquette, just nod and change the subject. If her opinion were flat-out crap – like something racist – I might deliver a pithy contradiction that indicated my displeasure with her unreasonable bias, and then change the subject or walk away. But under no circumstances would I suddenly call her a name or tell her she’s stupid. It’s just not done.

    So why is it okay to do that on Twitter?

    Mean people suck. Even on Twitter.

    I can’t help but think that it isn’t okay. It’s never okay to call people names when what you mean is that you disagree with an opinion they’ve expressed. That one opinion, after all, doesn’t define that person. Maybe you agree with them on 87 out of 100 issues, and enjoy their company and their taste in movies, too. But people seem to feel completely free to say terrible, dismissive things on Twitter when they would never say them as a part of the identical conversation if it occurred while we were all standing around at some social media function – which we frequently do!

    So I have two questions. First, why? Why do you (if you do) feel comfortable insulting people – people you know in actual meatspace, people who are friends with your friends or people that you see & will continue to see regularly as a part of your social engagement – on Twitter in a way that you wouldn’t do in person? Or is it only that people who do this on Twitter really would do the same thing in person? Is this the general “coarsening of the culture” (or, in political terms, “polarization of opinion”) that we keep hearing denounced? (And usually by the same people who engage in this practice!)

    My second question, and what really prompted me to write this post, is – What should I do about Twitter? My guidelines on “following” people have thus far been:

    1. Follow people I find interesting, funny, or thoughtful, but with whom I have no geographic connection.
    2. Follow local people who are part of the group of social media/urban activists in which I am beginning to move, and many of whom I have met.
    3. Follow local leaders with whom I must engage carefully, because of professional reasons.
    4. Follow a few funny feeds.
    5. Follow a few feeds for information and/or deals.

    Further guidelines regarding Group 2 – I try to show up to their events, or at least help promote what they’re trying to promote, with the expectation & understanding that they do the same w/in our little community. I try to meet in person as many of them as I can, so as to further strengthen our bond (and because they’re funny and cool people with whom I share many interests and/or mutual friends). I make it a point to regularly interact with them.

    Obviously, my problem is only a dilemma regarding group 2, because I’m not just “following” them but actively engaging them, online and off. Anyone else, I can either just shrug it off or unfollow. (Let’s not get into the question of people I want to engage to gain support for my employer.) But these group 2 people are being woven into the fabric of my social life. Is it too much to ask that they not call me names when we disagree? If I “unfollow” them, they’re still going to be there at these events & functions; they’re still going to be interacting with the people with whom I interact on Twitter and in my life.

    This comes up over and over again, especially in the realm of politics. I know so many people who seem to think that anyone who disagrees with their political opinions must do so only because they are evil/stupid/bigoted/whatever. But these people don’t seem to realize that they associate with a great number of people who disagree with them all the time, on this issue or that issue, and are still reasonably decent people. I guess I just wish people were generally more thoughtful and tolerant, even when they disagree passionately.

    Look, I know this isn’t a real problem. The answer is, unfollow people you don’t want to follow and don’t interact with them, online or off. Really, I just want to express my frustration that otherwise seemingly-intelligent, fun, friendly people are in reality close-minded and intolerant, people who can’t understand that thoughtful, principled disagreements are possible and that Twitter isn’t really the place for thoughtful discussion of just about anything.

    Or am I the one who is in the wrong here, and I should just carry on cultivating relationships with people who insult and demean others, including people they’ve met and (presumably pleasantly) associated with in real life, because that’s just what people do on the internet?

    *I do pride myself on the fact that I do not define these terms generally to mean “People who disagree with me,” but in fact limit their use to actual bigots, racists, and homophobes – for instance, many of my relatives.

    **I don’t have any opinion on the Mayor, never having met him; but I’m actually surprised at how much I enjoy his Twitter feed. I separate these two thoughts because I’m pretty sure that’s not actually the Mayor tweeting, even the ones with “#fgs” in them.

  • Older Posts Yeah! There are more posts, check them out.